Wednesday, February 29, 2012

An Interesting Perspective on Authentic Reenacting

Speaking to the visitors of the future
I was speaking to a group of visitors - modern visitors - who were on a tour during a living history Christmas presentation this past December. It was at Historic Fort Wayne and a few of us were doing our best to show everyday life on Christmas Eve 1861. We were situated in the elegant house that once belonged to the commander, and so we gave the impression of being a well-to-do family and friends for our scenario. In the family parlor the lady of the house was playing the pump organ while the rest were singing traditional carols. The modern visitors, numbering around 20 or so, enjoyed this scene that jumped right out of the past.
Our servant girl continued doing what 
she was paid to do, especially on Christmas Eve!
As any wealthy family would have employed, we had a domestic there, cleaning, sweeping, and keeping house for us. While speaking to the tourists, our servant girl, who had been dusting the furniture in the entrance hall, stopped what she was doing and peaked in the doorway to watch and listen to the Christmas celebration in the parlor. After about two minutes of her standing there, rag in hand, I abruptly stopped my presentation to the visitors, turned to the servant and sternly said, "Miss Graber, do you not have work to do?"
She popped back into reality and replied, "Yes, yes. I'm sorry." And proceeded to continue dusting.
One woman in the tour group was taken aback at what just occurred.
"You are making her work on Christmas Eve?" she asked. "And you're not even going to let her enjoy the celebration?"
"Ma'am," I said, "I have more family coming to-morrow for Christmas, and this house must be spotless!"
I then continued on with my presentation.
The rest of the tour group loved this.
Pretty authentic, wouldn't you say?
On a side note, after the last tour group left, we gathered all of our living historian participants together for a group photo. Miss Graber, standing in the front, was told by the lady of the house, "Servants in the back!"
Our domestic obliged.
Yes, we do take our fun seriously.

Posing for a photograph - 
this is what the future sees
Posing for a photograph - 
this is what WE saw
I bring this up because of a very thoughtful posting by a fellow blogger (World Turned Upside Down) that speaks on racism and discrimination in reenacting. No, she does not accuse anyone of racism; she instead brings up the point of authentic living history and the period-correct associations with African Americans and even the Irish.
Miss Stephanie Ann, the publisher of World Turned Upside Down blog, asks numerous questions in her post, such as Is it our responsibility to go against our moral to portray something so horrific as slavery? Are period appropriate interactions, inappropriate today? Should the Irish Brigade have derogatory names thrown at them? and  Should reenactors have to act in defiance of their modern day beliefs?
All are very good questions - questions that are rarely (if ever) brought up.
A good domestic will help wherever she is needed

I included the above written scenario of our domestic here, who is white, because that's a scene rarely played out. Let's be honest, it seems most in our hobby would rather wear the elegant dresses or the dandy suits rather than dress as the majority of the population did, much less dress and act as a domestic, who were, by the way, looked down upon.
But Miss Graber enjoys her portrayal very much. We have worked with her numerous other times as well and she said she loves the authenticity of it. She has a passion for the past and history in her heart, so she realizes what she is doing is bringing a part of the past to life in an authentic and accurate way. Much more realistic than dozens of women dressed gaily in their gowns doing needlepoint.
Of course, outside of our scenario, Miss Graber is an equal with everyone else - we do not carry on with her status or treat her any differently once the scenario is not in play.
And that's as it should be.
I don't know if you've noticed, however, that there are very few African Americans that participate in Civil War reenacting, especially as civilians. And I'm sure some of you are saying, "Well, why would they want to? To be period correct, most would be treated like dirt!"
According to what I have read, this seems to be a sad fact.
But it was the norm of the time in which we are portraying, was it not?
As Miss Stephanie Ann noted, "There are some people who somehow think that everyone in the south was racist and a supporter of slavery. They also think that everyone in the north was an abolitionist or somehow more enlightened than their southern counterparts. This type of thinking is juvenile at best and shows little understanding of the complex social and economic roots of the problems of the time period. Many  people also don't notice the "actor" in reenactor and falsely accuse Confederate reenactors of racism. They don't understand that reenactors portray people of the past and our real views are very different from the views we may portray.  Will "period discrimination" enforce these falsehoods?"
Very well stated.
So what does one do to address the issue of slavery and the black population of 1862 - North or South - during a reenactment? In my opinion, it all depends on how you do your presentation. For instance, if you are strictly a "teaching" presenter - no 1st person, only talking to the public in an informative style - this should be relatively easy. By continuing in that same manner you only have to speak to the public about the research you've done on the subject ("just the facts, ma'am"). A good starting point would be to do research on what Miss Stephanie Ann noted above to verify her information. (I have and my findings agree with her.)
It can be a little trickier for those of us who do 1st person. The subject of slavery and black life in general has been brought up to me at several reenactments while I was in first person. That's when I remove my hat, take a side-step, and let the visitors know that I am stepping out of my character to answer a question. At that point I do my best to give a truthful answer from my own research.
I then put on my hat, retract my step, and get back into my 1st person mode.

But what if there is an African American reenactor in the midst? What then?
Again - been there, done that.
Although I do my best to show life as it was to the best of my ability, I am also a man of the 20th/21st century, and have a few modern principals (only a few!) that were quite different than our ancestors, one of which is how to treat in kindness all human beings no matter what race or sex. I simply cannot treat an African American (or any other kind person) like dirt. Well, I suppose if said A. A. and I both agreed to a scenario I probably could, but to just do it off the cuff is not in my nature.
I guess I would have to consider myself a northern abolitionist-type of Victorian citizen.
By the way, I have another blogger friend who does living history. She is an African American woman with a strong passion for the past and shows another side of 19th century A.A. living in her blog.

I'm not sure if I helped with Miss Stephanie Ann's original post or if I opened up another door, but I do find this a subject of interest.

(4 out of the 5 photos here were taken by Ian Kushnir. The 5th one -Miss Graber cleaning the hall tree- was one I took)




.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

It Is 1850...What the Heck are all These Mills for Anyhow?

As you move about your modern town or city, chances are you will see factories.  I know within a two mile radius in any direction from where I live I can come across multiple factories - dozens,  perhaps - employing a wealth of workers who make the items  (or parts of items)  we need and use on a daily basis,  whether plastics for limitless things  (practically everything we use today has some plastic in it)  or metal  (automobiles and small engines mainly).
And we think nothing of these  (usually)  brick enclosed and somewhat dirty or grimy industrial buildings.  I've even seen factories way out in the country,  pretty much in the middle of nowhere. 
We also see delivery trucks come and go daily at these places,  picking up or dropping off parts. 
And that's another piece of our daily lives we think little about:  delivery trucks.  They are everywhere,  aren't they?  Coming and going,  moving day and night to deliver the all-important merchandise in a timely manner.
How would it be,  then,  that if  suddenly,  without warning,  you find yourself taking a trip through time and space:  you're traveling through another dimension,  a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind...
And you have landed in 1850 - right smack-dab in the middle of the 19th century!
Ticking away the moments that
make up a small day...

What now?  You have no money or food...you need to find a means for basic survival.  At the sign post up ahead...you find the way to town.
One thing you will notice as you walk along the road to town is the absence of the dozens of factories.  Not totally,  mind you,  for there are a few,  such as iron,   glass,  and textile factories.  But not nearly as many and nothing like as in the 21st century.
However,  one common type of industry you will see in 1850 that is a rarity in the 21st century are the mills that were so prominent.  I googled  "21st Century Mills"  and,  well,  click the link to see where that took me.  Now look what happened when I googled 19th Century Mills.  What a difference,  eh?
Yes,  we still have cider mills in our modern age - practically every city person here in Michigan visits the cider mill come autumn.  And for the most part these were built in the 19th century,  many even using 150 year old machinery to run them.
Ahhh...tradition lives...
But most of  the rest of the mills that were once so prominent are no longer around for the most part,  or are so few that you really have to search far and wide to find one.  Unless,  of course,  you go to an open-air historical museum such as Greenfield or Crossroads Village - that's where I had to go to get most of the photographs in this post.
But there are a few still left in their original locations.  In fact,  my wife and I very recently actually had to find a working carding mill.  I think you may know she does spinning on a spinning wheel and we will,  every-so-often,  acquire raw wool directly off the sheep. Oftentimes she will pick through,  card,  and wash all of this wool before spinning,  though as one who works outside the home,  that takes a mighty long time to do,  so we know of a place that still does carding.  A number of years ago we  found one up in Frankenmuth  (about an hour and a half drive north of Detroit)  called Zeilinger Wool Company.  They use 100+  year old carding machines to prepare the wool for spinning.  As odd as it may sound,  it was kind of neat to have to go to a carding mill to get our wool prepared,  very similar to our own ancestors.
Sometimes visiting such a mill gets me to thinking about other mills I might have visited had I been living back during the mid-19th century,  or even further back to the 18th century. 
Now,  this post is in no way an in depth report of mills,  but rather a quick overview.
Since I just spoke of going to the carding mill,  that's a good place to begin with:
This is the Gunsolly Carding Mill,  originally located in Plymouth, Michigan.
This circa 1850-51 mill,  built by John Gunsolly,  was originally located on the Middle Rouge River,  and illustrates the changeover from hand-operated  (carding paddles)  to labor-saving mechanical equipment brought about by the industrial revolution,  which resulted in the mass production and mass supply of goods.
One must remember that until the earlier part of the 19th century,  America was basically a hand-crafted nation,  with artisans working at home or in small shops where the human hand was the main source of power.
Wool a-waiting processing.
Future auto magnet Henry Ford and his father  (and many other farmers in the area)  used to bring raw wool sheared from their flocks of sheep to this very mill where the wool was carded,  a process where fibers are opened,  cleaned, and straightened in preparation for spinning,  and then made into rovings  (a long and narrow bundle of fiber with a twist to hold the fiber together),  which were then taken home for spinning into thread or yarn by their wives and daughters.
The carding machine that made life so much easier for women of the 19th century
John Gunsolly ran this mill from 1850-51 to 1870.  Many farmers would exchange their loads for a proportionate amount of the carded rovings instead of paying cash - a barter system.
By the end of the 19th century,  larger mills,  many located on the east coast of our country,  took away business from the smaller ones such as this.
 A closer look at the Gunsolly carding mechanism
And here are the carding machines at the Zeilinger Wool Company in Frankenmuth that my wife and I visited recently:
There is really not much of a difference between the Plymouth Mill and this one
except the machines here are a bit larger. But the process is the same.

From the carding mill we'll head over to the ever-popular and most important gristmill:
The Atlas Gristmill from 1836 now located inside Crossroads Village.
From colonial times and into the first three quarters of the nineteenth century,  gristmills flourished in America by meeting an important local need in agricultural communities:  grinding the farmers'  grain into flour with large,  circular stones.
The founding father of Atlas,  Michigan was Judge Norman Davison,  who arrived here in 1831 from Livingston County,  New York.  He cleared the land and built a house for his family near the river on the site where the Atlas Country Club now stands.  Soon after Davison settled in this location,  many more settlers came to the town,  and it was here that he erected a gristmill in 1836.  
The sleuth,  which powers the mill.
Gristmills flourished in America by meeting an important local need in agricultural communities by grinding the farmer's grain into flour.  It is operated by water-driven turbine beneath the water surface so the mill can operate in winter if the surface of the water is frozen.  
The water power turns the large stone wheels used for grinding.
Each granite stone,  which were made around 1835 in North Carolina,  weighs 1800 pounds.  The turning wheels could grind one barrel of flour  (whole wheat or buckwheat)  or corn meal an hour.
The grain slides down the chute to the  “hopper,”  which has a
funnel-like appearance.  The hopper disperses the grain to the
stones to be ground and emptied out into the flour bin, 
ready to be sacked for the customer.
The Atlas Mill actually remained in operation until 1943,  when, due in part to WWII,  replacement parts for repairs were no longer available.  The mill was dismantled and moved to Crossroads Village in 1975 where it was renovated and then moved,  in 1977,  to its current location inside the Village.
At one time,  Crossroads operated the mill as was done 150 years ago.  Unfortunately - more recently - the sights and sounds and feel of the spinning,  grinding wheels that gave the public a first-hand glimpse of an earlier age is no more,  for the most part.  
They electrified it,  so its heart and soul is gone.
It was once an early portrayal of living history.  So real,  in fact, that one ould just imagine local farmers,  with their pack horse,  ox cart,  or on foot,  coming to the gristmill from miles around,  carrying the grain to be ground into flour.
With sheep farming gaining in popularity in 19th century Atlas,  Michigan,  Oliver Palmer built a wool carding and stock dressing business,  and a woolen mill was erected next to the gristmill during the 1850's.  There were many other settlers who contributed to the prosperity of Atlas including the first blacksmith,  Enas Rockafellow,  who arrived in 1837,  Fitch R. Tracy who began a mercantile business in the late 1830's,  and Dr. Elbridge Gale,  who started his practice right there in Atlas in 1837.  The first tavern appeared on the scene in 1840.  Noah Hull,  as a carpenter and millwright,  helped build many of the businesses and houses after his arrive in 1846.  Furniture for the town's people was made by the local cabinet maker,  Mr.  James Shields.  Residents could have their shoes repaired or have new ones made by the shoemaker,  James Lobban...
With the increase of families coming to the area,  a school was started in 1837.  One can just imagine this small mid-19th century town,  how it looked in the early days.  Probably very similar to what Crossroads Village open air museum looks like today.

Here is another gristmill,  this one  (of two)  located in Greenfield Village,  and is one that most don't think of as a mill in its definition,  the Farris Windmill:
One of the oldest structures in the United States -
the Farris Windmill.
Named after the Farris family who ran this mill for three generations,  this windmill is said to be the oldest windmill in the United States,  built in 1633,  and stood at the road to West Yarmouth,   Massachusetts.  It now stands at the southeast end of Greenfield Village.
I hope to one day see the sails turning in the wind...
This mill was built like those the early pilgrim settlers had seen during their exile in Holland.  Young men were induced to become millers by being exempted from taxes and military duty.  Winds off the Atlantic and Cape Cod Bay turned the mammoth fifty four foot sails,  grinding corn into meal in ten minutes or in three hours,  depending on the wind force.  The long lever between the roof and the ground is used to turn both the roof and the sails in the most favorable positions.  
This mill was moved several times,  that being easier than finding a millwright to build a new one.  The initials  "T.G."  and  "1782"  were carved in one of the beams during a move.
The interior has a winding stairway which leads upward
three stories from the ground level to the revolving roof area.
On the second floor above the foundation are the millstones,  which are turned by wooden gears,  and below are the hoppers and bins which hold the grain and meal.
Who doesn't visit the cider mill in the fall in Michigan?
From the gristmill and windmill we'll head over to the Cider Mill.  This cider mill is a replicated 19th century mill that was constructed inside of Greenfield Village in 1942 to conform with the 19th century cider making machinery Henry Ford had in his collection.  Demonstrations of pressing apples into cider used to take place here every fall for many years up until recently.
Due to insurance,  I believe.
19th century machinery inside the cider mill.
Sweet and hard cider,  as well as cider vinegar,  were important orchard byproducts essential to the economy of rural communities.  In the 1800's,  farmers could haul their apples to cider mills like this one to have them ground and pressed into cider.  The cider making equipment in this building came from a mill in Martinsville,  Michigan.
Cider,  by the way,  was the most popular drink of the 19th century.
A country scene:  The train and the cider mill
And cider mills are still very popular here in the 21st century.  Here in Michigan one of the busiest we have is Yates. 
As is written on their website:  
With a history that dates back to 1863,  Yates Grist Mill opened its doors beside the rapidly flowing waters of the  ‘then’  Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal  (now the Clinton River).  The Clinton River cascades over the Yates dam,  which supplies the headwaters to power the mill.  The dam was built to create a stream that the mill uses for water power.
A working 19th century cider mill still in its original location.
By 1876,  the Yates family installed a cider press into the existing water-powered process and began producing delicious Michigan cider.  It then became known as Yates Cider Mill.  Local farmers,  orchard owners and landowners would bring their apples to Yates for custom apple pressing.  Over all these years,  Yates has been producing the same kind of fresh 100%  all natural cider that folks enjoyed way back in 1876.

Now we'll head over to Hanks Silk Mill,  which produces  (according to the Hanks brothers themselves)  "the oldest and best brand of silk on the continent."
Hanks Silk Mill
Hanks Silk Mill was built in 1810 by Rodney and Horatio Hanks in Mansfield,  Connecticut,  and produced the first machine-made silk in America.
The Hanks brothers originally built the mill over a waterway which they had diverted from a stream.  As with many mills,  the water fell from a large flat rock onto a mill wheel.
Mulberry Trees near the silk mill.
Once moved to Greenfield Village,  the wheel was removed and a nearby grove of mulberry trees were planted especially for the mill,  providing food for the young silkworms needed to produce the cocoons.  Although the mulberry trees are still there,  this production is no longer presented at the mill,  as the time and energy it took to produce the silk was too time consuming for the little amount provided.
Inside the silk mill.
The original machinery of this mill burned,  leaving just a few iron parts.  But,  the visitor can still see the same type of wooden reeds that once wound the thin strands of silk,  as well as the parts that twisted the strands into a thread in tact as Mr.  Ford had a reproduction of the machinery built.

From the Hanks Brothers mill we move to the Fairfield Rice Mill,  of which William Alston had erected in 1787.
This historic building is no longer presented as a mill,
but,  instead,  the pottery shop.
Once situated on the Fairfield Plantation at the Waccamaw River near Georgetown,  South Carolina,  this brick building housed the threshers,  grindstones,  shafts,  and pulleys needed for the miller to do his job of threshing the grains of rice.  A rice huller or rice husker was an agricultural machine used to automate the process of removing the chaff and the outer husks of rice grain and was more than likely used in this building.

And now we'll head to another mill,  the Cotton Gin Mill,  originally from Richmond Hill Plantation in Ways,  Georgia,  was said to be the only building on the plantation that remained standing after General Sherman marched his troops through the district on their way to the sea in late 1864.
The Cotton Gin Mill
I cannot,  at this time,  find information about this building or even about Cotton mills except from Wikipedia which states   (in part):
The architectural development of the cotton mill was linked to the development of the machinery which it contained,  the power unit that drove it,  and the financial instruments used for its construction.  The process led to combined mills where carding,  spinning and weaving took place in the same mill.  Mills were also used for finishing such as bleaching and printing.
Prior to the introduction of the mechanical cotton gin,  cotton had required considerable labor to clean and separate the fibers from the seeds.  With Eli Whitney’s introduction of  “teeth”  in his cotton gin to comb out the cotton and separate the seeds,  cotton became a tremendously profitable business,  creating many fortunes in the south,  much to the detriment of the slaves who were forced to work the plantations.
The invention of the cotton gin caused massive growth in the production of cotton in the mainly southern part of the U.S.  Cotton production expanded from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales in 1850.  As a result, the South became even more dependent on plantation and slavery,  with plantation agriculture becoming the largest sector of the Southern economy.  By 1860,  the southern states were providing two-thirds of the world’s supply of cotton, and up to eighty percent of the crucial British market.

From the cotton mill we'll move to the Sorghum  (or sugar)  Mill.
This Sorghum Mill,  believed to be from the 1850's,  was reassembled from an old sugar mill found in Louisiana near Harahan not far from New Orleans.
Most communities had a sorghum mill.  During the autumn,  sorghum cane raised in fields and farmers brought their harvested cane to the mill.  In the cane mill,  the 6-to-12-foot stalks were crushed between rollers powered by a water wheel or,  in some instances,  a mule walking in a circle,  to extract the juice The resulting juice was boiled down in large pans to a thick,  sweet syrup.  As the juice is boiled down,  greenish foam is skimmed off the top.  When the amber-colored syrup reaches the desired consistency,  it is cooled and put up in jars.  Drizzled over hot biscuits and cornbread,  added to baked beans,  and gingerbread,  this sweetener,  sometimes referred to as molasses,  has flavored many a meal.  It was also poured over pancakes and biscuits,  and used as an ingredient to flavor cakes,  cookies,  and candy.  Some people still prefer it as a sweetener,  and a few still make it. But its consumption has now been surpassed by the granulated white sugar bought in grocery stores.
The Sorghum (Sugar) Mill
These are the only photos I was able to obtain of both the Cotton and Sugar mills,  and I had to get them from an out-of-print book I own  ("Greenfield Village:  Preserving America's Heritage").  I wish I had thought to photograph them during my visits years ago.


Now to the saw mill...
The Spofford Saw Mill
Built on a stone foundation,  the Spofford Saw Mill was built in Georgetown,  Massachusetts in the late 1600's by John  (or possibly son Abner - or both)  Spofford.  Lumber from this mill was used to make houses,  barns,    shops, and possibly ships.  This is an  "up-and-down"  saw mill,  and is one of the earliest water-run saw mills still in existence.  The vertical blade flashes up and down while suspended between the two floors of the building, hence,  the name  "up and down"  saw mill.  Saw mills were one of the first mills built in local communities,  aside from the gristmill,  for they supplied the lumber to build all other establishments as well as so many of the household goods and furniture.
Now I ask you,  where else but in Greenfield Village does such an ancient mill still exist?
This mill remained in the Spofford family until the mid-1800's,  and the new owners continued to serve the community until 1925.
Inside the Spofford Sawmill.


There is also the Stony Creek Saw Mill from Greenfield Village.
This was not an original building,  but a replication,
and has,  since,  been removed.
However...there is still a history to be told...
This was a replicated circular saw mill and was used to cut lumber for use in construction.  Logs were set on a carriage frame on a track and fed into the spinning saw.  After 1850,  circular sawmills were common in Michigan and other lumbering communities across America.  A mill of this type was operated by the water of Stony Creek in Monroe,  Michigan,  powered by a waterwheel,  though Mr.  Ford converted the machinery to a steam engine.
The exterior,  according to the Benson Ford Research Center, 
was a replica of the original structure of the 1850's,  built in the Village in 1928.

And yet another saw mill known as the Tripp mill.
An original building from 1855.
Early settlers in Michigan needed homes,  barns,  and shops.  As farmers cleared the forests for more farm land,  the trees provided a plentiful supply of wood.  As mentioned,  sawmills were among the first mills established in towns and farming communities,  and it was at these sawmills that the wood was cut into lumber to build the homes,  barns,  and shops.
An original 1855 Michigan sawmill.
The 1855 Tripp Sawmill,  originally from Franklin Center  (now Tipton),    Michigan,  near Tecumseh in Lenauwee County and built by J.D. Tripp,  featured an up and down saw similar to the one Henry Ford operated in his youth.  Powered by a steam engine on the bottom floor,  the vertical blade flashes up and down while suspended between the two floors of the building,  hence the name  "up and down"  saw mill.  The original machinery in this mill cuts lumber in the 19th century style,  by emulating the same motion of cutting lumber by hand with a pit saw,  which was invaluable for accurate restorations in the Village.
I would love to see this mill in  "action."
Much Michigan timber went through this mill when the Tripps owned and operated it from 1855 until 1916.  It ran for four months out of the year with just three or four workers.  During those few months,  the workers cut all the lumber that the surrounding community needed.  The mill was closed in 1916 when competition from the railroads made it easy to move lumber throughout the region from large scale logging operations.

................

Until the 19th century,  America was basically a hand-craft-oriented nation,  with craftsmen working at home or in relatively small shops,  with hand-action as the main source of power.  But the development of water-power helped to greatly lower the need for the hand-crafts.  With water driving the turbines that then turned the power gears and belts,  the age of machine-made work helped the nation to prosper.  What the various mills could produce was seemingly limitless.
But by the middle of the 20th century,  however,  mills became mostly objects of wonder and of the past,  for they had lost,  by then,  all prominence in their place in society.  Once found in every town across America,  by 1950 they had become a curiosity.

By the way,  as a civilian reenactor/living historian I find this sort of information useful,  for the milling trades would have been something I would have been very familiar with.



























  


~   ~   ~

Monday, February 20, 2012

Update: Look Into the Future - How Much of Our Time Will Be Lost?

"

~The following is an update of a posting from last year~


I found the above note while on Facebook and I wondered just how many people actually knew what the Library of Alexandria was. Just in case you don't know I will give a very basic bit of information here (taken from eHistory) followed by my 'editorial' on how future generations may perceive us if we don't save today:


"The loss of the ancient world's single greatest archive of knowledge, the Library of Alexandria, has been lamented for ages. But how and why it was lost is still a mystery. The mystery exists not for lack of suspects but from an excess of them. 
Alexandria was founded in Egypt by Alexander the Great. His successor as Pharaoh, Ptolomy II Soter, founded the Museum or Royal Library of Alexandria in 283 BC. The Museum was a shrine of the Muses modeled after the Lyceum of Aristotle in Athens. The Museum was a place of study which included lecture areas, gardens, a zoo, and shrines for each of the nine muses as well as the Library itself. It has been estimated that at one time the Library of Alexandria held over half a million documents from Assyria, Greece, Persia, Egypt, India and many other nations. Over 100 scholars lived at the Museum full time to perform research, write, lecture or translate and copy documents. The library was so large it actually had another branch or "daughter" library at the Temple of Serapis.
So who did burn the Library of Alexandria? Unfortunately most of the writers from Plutarch (who apparently blamed Caesar) to Edward Gibbons (a staunch atheist or deist who liked very much to blame Christians and blamed Theophilus) to Bishop Gregory (who was particularly anti-Moslem, blamed Omar) all had an axe to grind and consequently must be seen as biased. Probably everyone mentioned above had some hand in destroying some part of the Library's holdings. The collection may have ebbed and flowed as some documents were destroyed and others were added.
The real tragedy of course is not the uncertainty of knowing who to blame for the Library's destruction but that so much of ancient history, literature and learning was lost forever."


I think you'll agree that the above ties in well with what I have written below:
In the reenacting community I portray a postmaster. I have a pretty decent set up at my tent including a desk, the mail holder, period stationary, period writing utensils, and enough historical information to teach visitors in (hopefully) an interesting and fun manner about the mail during the Civil War era. I also explain just how important the mail was to both the soldier and the citizen. I like to ask the visitor what they thought might have been written in the letters coming from home to the soldier fighting hundreds of miles away.
Almost everyone gets it right: they wrote about the everyday goings on in their daily lives; they wrote of the happenings in their community; they wrote of friends and family. And they wrote about these subjects in great detail:

June 3rd, 1862
My Dear Husband,
I got here the Friday after I left you, found all well but Aunt Hester, her arm is getting like her leg was. I had a very tiresome trip. You never saw the roads in such condition. I got stuck twice, once I had to get out and then the buggy had to be priyed up before Julia (the horse) could pull the empty buggy out. The horses all seemed to stand the trip very well. The children would get tired every evening, but in the morning was always impatient to start. They were well all the way, but Lillia was pretty much sick all the way. I don't think it is anything but hives.

And the letter continues for four full pages in this manner.
But, what a great description of what it was like to travel!

We have learned so much about the Civil War era through the letters and diaries of those who were there. And it's because of these letters and diaries that we can very accurately recreate a scene so accurate from the past that if we could bring one from the era back to life they would be very familiar and comfortable with our presentation.
So much of it is due to the written word of the time.
And now we have e-mails that can easily replace the letter. Think about it: instead of writing out a letter, buying a stamp, sending it out, then hoping it's delivered in a short time (within a week, maybe) we can just send out a quick note via the computer. Or send a text message via cell phones. Or instant messenger. Messages on Facebook.
Skype!
But, let me ask you a question: how many of you reading this posting actually print out your e-mails or any of the other 21st century communications that you receive?
I thought so...
So, who, 150 years in the future, will know about our everyday lives?
It's scary to think that the only history of our times future generations might know is from what today's media will tell them.
And we all know just how accurate today's media is (cough cough).
For instance, when Obama and McCain were running against each other for president in 2008, the way the media presented it one would think that Obama won by 90 percent of the votes.
Not true.
Not even close.
In fact, it was much closer than the media would have you believe:
the popular vote was 69,456,897 for Obama to 59,934,814 for McCain.
Not nearly as great a divide as the media would have us all believe.
Typical.
(By the way, this is not a political posting - - I just want to show my point, so please, no political commentary. It will not get posted).
The media follows their own truth.
Their own fashion.
And, whatever the media today says is the truth is what folks in the future may be forced to believe.
Because they will have nothing else to go on.
And we need to prevent that from happening.
It's really not that hard.
For me personally, I keep a journal. I type in it daily - even if it's just a quick little blurb. And, if I receive an e-mail from someone that is a personal-type e-mail, I will copy and paste it into the journal. In this way I have it.
My journal also consists of me and my family's daily activities, including (sometimes, but not all the time) our eating habits, TV shows and movies we enjoy watching, our historical events, some of our purchases, visits from neighbors and friends and extended family, prices of certain items, etc.
Yes, everyday life.
I also, by the way, print out a hard copy of what I've written at each month's end.
If you don't want to write a journal, then at least copy and paste your e-mails (and text messages if you can) onto a word document and print that out every so often.
But, I hope you would take a few minutes out of your busy day and write a little something.

How about photographs? How many of you with digital cameras actually print out your pictures?
I do.
Especially now that film is going the way of the vinyl record album, 8-track or cassette tape, and TV antenna.

Well, not every picture - I take over a thousand photos every year and choose the best to be printed. Yes, I go through a lot of ink and paper, but to me it's worth it. I suppose I could take a disc of my favorites to the local Rite Aid or CVS and have them print my pictures out cheaper, but I enjoy doing different things with my photos including printing them at different sizes and sometimes even printing little stories or bits of information to go with them.

By the way, I also store my computer information (text and photos) on an external hard drive and update that monthly as well.
Why do I do all this?
You see, I have this fear that one day (for whatever reason) our computers may not be accessible, therefore rendering everything not printed onto hard-copy, inaccessible (can you say floppy disc?).
What now?

Seriously - so much of our history is being lost. I really hate thinking that the media will be dictating our lives to future generations, don't you?